MCLA Admissions SAT Scores, Acceptance Rate, Tuition

Ants, Bees, and Wasps

The Lady with the Pet Dog Free Essays

Comparison of two stories of the same name A story of two lovers in an affair is never a simple thing to understand. Anton Chekhov original and Joyce Carol Oates’s updated version of â€Å"The Lady with the Pet Dog† tells the story of two unhappy individuals trying to find love in a long lasting affair. Both versions of the story are similar in plot, but the different point of view allows readers to view the conflicts and emotions that each character faces, instead of just getting one side of the story. We will write a custom essay sample on The Lady with the Pet Dog or any similar topic only for you Order Now Although both stories follow the same plot, there are many differences that help readers understand the emotions of the protagonist. Chekhov’s version of â€Å"The Lady with the Pet Dog† the main protagonist is a male named Dmitry Gurov. The third person point of view allows readers to only see how Gurov’s emotions throughout the story and not his love interest Anna. Gurov is an unfaithful husband and views women as the â€Å"inferior race† (Chekhov 205). He has been through many affairs in Moscow that he already knows that the affair will grow into an â€Å"extreme complexity† (205) and when the end comes a â€Å"painful situation is created† (205). In Oates version the protagonist is Anna, who is not as timid as she appears in Chekhov’s version. Anna doesn’t know what it feels like to have a bond with a person, because she can’t seem to connect with her husband. The affair allows Anna some freedom from her boring life and allows her to have some purpose in life. Yet she feels guilty for being in an affair with a stranger. The plot in Chekhov’s version is very straight forward being in chronological order, whereas Oates mixes the plot around starting with the climax first. They share the same climax of the theater, but in both stories Anna reacts differently when seeing her lover appear to see her. In Chekhov’s version, Anna is shocked by Gurov’s appearance. She tells him that she is suffering and thinks only about him, but wants to forget everything that happened. Yet she is knows she wants to be with him so she promises to see him in Moscow and tells him to leave. While in Oates’s version, Anna is shocked and very unpleased with seeing her lover, and makes sure he doesn’t come near her. Her lover then calls her, and we see that Anna get frustrated with him for calling her. We can see that Oates was trying to give Anna a little more power in the affair unlike Chekhov. The mix of the plot in Oates’s version I feel allows readers to really understand Anna and her emotions. It would’ve been easier to understand if it was in order, but Oates took the same story and updated it and wrote it in a way that made it much different from Chekhov’s. She gave Anna life and we got to see how the guilt ate at her, while Gurov wasn’t really affected as bad as she was in Chekhov’s. I had to read Oates’s story more than once to get the story into order, which allowed me to think more about Anna’s feelings more then I could do if I only read it once. In both stories the protagonist are stuck in unhappy marriages, but neither actually make an effort to divorce. The setting of Chekhov’s version takes place at the turn of the century, so I feel maybe divorce wasn’t an option for both characters then. Yet Oates had her story take place in the 1970’s, which happened to be a time of feminism, which to my surprise Anna never thought about leaving her husband for her lover. The confusing emotions from an unhappy marriage and guilt drove Anna crazy. She would ponder â€Å"this is fate†¦to be here and not there, to be one person and not another, a certain man’s wife and not the wife of another man† (222). We could tell she just wants to be accepted from someone, and that was her lover. The guilt of cheating even on a broken marriage drove her to tell her lover that she wished that one of her men would die, so it could make things easier on her. In each story we find that the protagonist finds some sort of love in the end of the story. Chekhov’s character Gurov, sees his wife as â€Å"limited intelligence, narrow minded and dowdy† (205). Anna seems to be the opposite of his wife, which makes him even more attractive to her. Gurov has been in many affairs, but each time he was left lonely, because he was focused on looking for the sexual aspect of the relationship and not the emotional. Anna allowed him to open up emotionally, giving him someone to talk to. In the end Gurov knew he was growing old and that he truly for the first time actually loved someone. Oates’s Anna, has been through a lot of confusion never knowing who she loved. She almost commits suicide and gives up on her relationship. It takes her sometime, but she finally learns to accept her lover and the secrets. Anna was looking for her own identity and love, but she had to learn to love herself first before she could love anyone else. With the third person point of view we are limited to so much information, but Oates’s adaption sheds light on the other half of the story. A one sided story would’ve left readers with a lot of questions concerning Anna. It’s like they made the affair seem so easy in Chekhov’s version, but we find out that they struggled just like any couple would. Although the stories shared many similarities they did have their difference in approach. Works Cited Chekhov, Anton. â€Å"The Lady with the Pet Dog. † The Compact Bedford Introduction to Literature. Ed. Michael Meyer. 8th ed. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin;s 2009. 205-16 Oates, Joyce Carol. â€Å"The Lady with the Pet Dog. † The Compact Bedford Introduction to Literature. Ed. Michael Meyer. 8th ed. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin;s 2009. 219-31 How to cite The Lady with the Pet Dog, Papers

Practices Model

Question: Write an essay on Practices Model. Answer: Introduction Practices models are helpful to offer a better framework in order to describe visualise and examine the interrelationship of the key elements of "professional practice." Although all of the models have some limitations, each is developed based on philosophies, which help to describe the scope and nature of the service, therapist interaction and the nature of the client (Austin, 2013). This report is aimed to find out the description and rationale of the therapeutic recreation (TR) and the result of its implementation in a community. Background setting The TR model or Therapeutic Recreation model was introduced in 1995 by Van Andel, Carter and Rob. Often this model is paired with TR Service Outcome Model, which in turn is helpful to increase the merit and worthiness of the TR Services. This service model was developed as a flexible so that this service model could be implemented in any therapeutic recreation setting. The researchers developed this model based on the assumption that leisure as a means as well as an end can coexist. According to Bksi et al. (2011), the aim of the researchers was tried to present intervention either leisure or non-leisure towards the clients. However, the outcome of this model should be "quality of life." According to Anderson Heyne, (2012), the ultimate goal of implementing this model is to empower the clients in order to achieve her or hi desired goals and helped them to experience a sense of mastery, satisfaction, well-being and fulfillment. Target Group The researchers Van Andel, Carter and Rob (1995) developed this model in order to help the patients who are suffering from illness or some particular disabilities. According to the researchers, Recreational Therapy offers services, which are based on individual's lifestyle and interests (Anderson Heyne, 2012). In this paper, the target group is the people of a small community in Queens. The services will be offered towards the children who are physically challenged and help them to achieve physical, social, cognitive and emotional goals. The Therapeutic Recreation will also be offered to those patients who need it most. Types of Services According to Snider et al., 2010, the services of Therapeutic Recreation should be offered based on the interests of individuals in the community. Therefore, before offering the Therapeutic Recreation services, it is important the company conducted a need assessment exercise, which proved as helpful to reveal the current position of the patients or the people who seek Therapeutic Recreation services. The types of services that could be offered may include Private Therapy, offering Friendship Club. In this context, it is important to mention that the focus group of this project should be small, which will be helpful for the service provider to help individual help seekers. Knowledge and professional skills of the service provider Offering Therapeutic Recreation services is not an easy task; therefore, it is important that the service providers should have specific knowledge as well as skills. In the community area, it is found that a large number of children need therapeutic interventions as they are suffering from mental illness as well as physical disabilities. Therefore, the service providers of the Therapeutic Recreation services need to be kind as well as polite towards the children. It is also found from the needs assessment that the children are afraid of unknown people and suffering from social stigma. In order to help these poor children, the professionals need to help them to be involved in socio-cultural programs and engage them in a creative program (Allsop, 2012). The professional should have patients to guide these children and extract the best out of them so that they can start believing in themselves. A friendship club could be formed to help them to be a part of something valuable and the pro fessionals should posses several creative skills to teach them. Service providers of TR There are different health care service providers who are offering Therapeutic Recreation Services in worldwide. One of the most renowned Therapeutic Recreation services is offered by Albert Health services, ATRA (American Therapeutic Recreation Association) and Spaulding Rehabilitation Network. According to Watson et al., (2010), the numbers of Therapeutic Recreation service providers in Australia are also increasing day by day. Summary of the investigation After investigating the progress of Therapeutic Recreation services in Worldwide, it can be said that Australia is keeping pace with the current improvement. The Therapeutic Recreation is a procedure, which utilizes functional intervention, education and helps the patients to meet their cognitive, emotional, physical and social goals (Kunstler Daly, 2010). It is found from the research study that the purpose of the Therapeutic Recreation (TR) is to enable an individual in order to achieve quality life as well as optimal health. The TR professionals work with the person with disabilities and improve the cognitive as well as physical activities (Stumbo Wardlaw, 2011). The TR professionals also help to foster greater involvement in the community and help the poor to strengthen their relationships and interpersonal skills. In this report, a small venture was taken to help the community members in Queens to provide a better life to their children. Although the results were satisfactory, it can be said that the Therapeutic Recreation services offered in this area need to be improved to help more people. Conclusion Offering Therapeutic Recreation services is not an easy task. From the research studies, it is found that the Therapeutic Recreation service providers need to recruit employees who are especially trained to take care of the patients who seek Therapeutic Recreation services. It is recognised that the service seekers are often very delicate and sensitive since they are mentally ill or suffering from physical challenges. Therefore, the service providers need to be very careful and should have a proper knowledge about their patient. Reference Allsop, J. (2012).Assessing the social effects of a therapeutic recreation summer camp for adolescents with chronic illness(Doctoral dissertation, The University of Utah). Anderson, L., Heyne, L. A. (2012).Therapeutic recreation practice: A strengths approach. Venture Pub.. Anderson, L. S., Heyne, L. A. (2012). Flourishing through leisure: An ecological extension of the Leisure and Well-Being Model in therapeutic recreation strengths-based practice.Therapeutic Recreation Journal,46(2), 129. Austin, D. R. (2013). Therapeutic recreation.Urbana,51, 61801. Bksi, A., Trk, S., Kknyei, G., Bokrts, I., Szentes, A., Telepczki, G. (2011). Health-related quality of life changes of children and adolescents with chronic disease after participation in therapeutic recreation camping program.Health and quality of life outcomes,9(1), 1. Carter, M. J., Van Andel, G. E. (2011).Therapeutic recreation: A practical approach. Waveland Press. Kunstler, R. A., Daly, F. S. (2010).Therapeutic recreation leadership and programming. Human Kinetics. Snider, L., Majnemer, A., Darsaklis, V. (2010). Virtual reality as a therapeutic modality for children with cerebral palsy.Developmental Neurorehabilitation,13(2), 120-128. Stumbo, N. J., Wardlaw, B. (Eds.). (2011).Facilitation of therapeutic recreation services: An evidence-based and best practice approach to techniques and processes. Venture Publishing. Watson, A., Hilton, D., Hackett, D. (2010). Therapeutic recreation camps to provide a residential experience for young people in transition to adult renal units.Pediatric Nephrology,25(4), 787-788.