Fallibilism and the Justified Deduction Principle

Information is one of the concepts that may be measured, evaluated, stored, and shared, but does this have the same connotation as knowledge. Even though these two notions are used interchangeably in most cases, it is difficult to see the difference without having sufficient ground for this. How can one state that justified true belief is knowledge? This problem was deeply examined by a German philosopher Edmund Gettier who explained the difference and provided significant evidence for questioning everything, as Descartes did. Explanations by Gettier are intricate and more related to the true or false correlation between something that a person believes to be the true and something that prevents him or her to think so. Edmund Gettier took the topic of justification and knowledge to the next level with his philosophical Gettier’s Problem. The Gettier Problem’s counterexamples is dependent on two principles, Fallibilism and the Justified Deduction Principle. The principle of Fallibilism is based off the belief that a person has the potential to be justified in believing a false statement while the Justified Deduction Principle entails that if a person has evidence to back up a certain claim, that person is justified to trust that claim. As these two principles highlight the Gettier Problem, it becomes clear that Edmund Gettier opposes the ‘Justified-True-Belief as knowledge’ concept. The only thing remains clear is when one person has some justified evidence for believing inShow MoreRelatedThe Gettier Problem: A Marathon Essay1081 Words   |  5 Pagesdebate. Though our understanding of knowledge is ambiguous, we do know that knowledge is justified, true belief. There have been attempts to answer the queries through the Justified-True-Belief Account of Knowledge (JTB), known to have been credited by Plato. According to the theory, knowledge is explained in some manner or way, a proposition known can’t be false, and the proposition must be accepted. The justified-true-belief account of knowledge, though, is considered to be a definition of knowledgeRead MoreHerbert Spencer Essay13142 Words   |  53 Pagesbut was a natural law operating in nature and human society. Not only was competition in harmony with nature, but it was also in the interest of the general welfare and progress. Social Darwinism, or Spencerism, became a total view of life which justified opposition to social reform on the basis that reform interfered with the operation of the natural law of survival of the fittest. Spencer visited the United States in 1882 and was much impressed by what he observed on a triumphal tour. He prophetically